Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
6 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Serge Pelet
Hello,
I'm imaging a sample with a CoolLed system and have an Hamamatsu Orca-ER firewire camera. As we discussed it before, I'm using a hardware trigger from the LED to the camera to synchronize the acquisition. Unfortunately,I still have some issues with the stability of the signal. For sort (<20 ms) and long exposures (>500 ms) everything is fine. However around 100 ms I see some fluctuations (25%) in the intensity of the signal. I have tried to play a bit with the delay for the CoolLed device. If I see a clear improvement if I set it to 5 or 10 ms but I need 50 ms to eliminate completely all the fluctuations.
Since the short exposure acquistions are reliable my impression was that there was a mismatch between the switching off of the LED and the CCD exposure time. Is this possible? My understanding was that the delay would change the time when the CCD is fired compared to the "opening" of the LED, but does it also apply for the switch off phase of the shutter?
Best,
Serge




Serge Pelet
ETH-Zurich
Institute of Biochemistry
CH-8093 Zurich

Phone: +41 44 633 44 17
Fax: +41 44 632 12 98



Begin forwarded message:

From: "Pelet  Serge" <[hidden email]>
Date: 26 juin 2009 16:10:20 GMT+02:00
Subject: Re: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Hi Nico and Gordon
Thanks for your input. I followed up on Nico's suggestion and I'm using the TTL signal generated by the CoolLed as an external trigger for the CCD. As far as I could test, it works beautifully. I can set exposure to 1 ms and still have a very stable signal from the image. The only compication is that I have to change the trigger settings for the CCD to edge for fluorescence imaging and Software for transmission light.
Thanks again,
Serge




Serge Pelet
ETH-Zurich
Institute of Biochemistry
Schafmattstr. 18 HPM G7
CH-8093 Zurich

[hidden email]
Phone: +41 44 633 44 17
Fax: +41 44 632 12 98



On 23 juin 09, at 17:52, Serge Pelet wrote:


Hi,
I'm imaging a sample with a CoolLed system and have an Hamamatsu Orca-ER firewire camera. When I use short exposure times (25 to 50 ms) I see huge fluctuations in the intensity of the sample. With 25 ms exposure it goes from no signal at all to decent image. As far as I can tell the fluctuation don't arise from the LED. At least I see at every frame the excitation light switching on and off. My guess is that it is more a timing issue: maybe a lack of synchronization between the CCD and the CoolLed. Is there a way to set-up a time delay between the CoolLed opening and the opening of the CCD camera?Thanks for your help.

Serge





Serge Pelet
ETH-Zurich
Institute of Biochemistry
Schafmattstr. 18 HPM G7
CH-8093 Zurich

[hidden email]
Phone: +41 44 633 44 17
Fax: +41 44 632 12 98







------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Nico Stuurman-4
Hi Serge,

> I'm imaging a sample with a CoolLed system and have an Hamamatsu  
> Orca-ER firewire camera. As we discussed it before, I'm using a  
> hardware trigger from the LED to the camera to synchronize the  
> acquisition. Unfortunately,I still have some issues with the  
> stability of the signal. For sort (<20 ms) and long exposures (>500  
> ms) everything is fine. However around 100 ms I see some  
> fluctuations (25%) in the intensity of the signal. I have tried to  
> play a bit with the delay for the CoolLed device. If I see a clear  
> improvement if I set it to 5 or 10 ms but I need 50 ms to eliminate  
> completely all the fluctuations.

I think that the logic in your setup is as follows when you do a  
SnapImage:
- Micro-Manager opens the CoolLED shutter
- The CoolLED sends a TTL to your camera.
- The camera (set in Edge Trigger mode) starts exposing a fixed period  
after receiving the TTL.  This is camera dependent, check your manual  
for the time delay.  For the C9100-13 I have here it is 0.78 msec.
- The camera will expose for the exposure time that you have  
previously set.
- In the mean time, Micro-Manager will call the camera function  
"SnapImage" (after waiting for the delay that you have given to the  
shutter).
- The Hamamatsu Snapimage function in your case will simply wait for  
the duration of the exposure time.
- The camera will start readout of the image once the exposure is done.
- Micro-Manager will close the shutter and wait for the image to be  
delivered by the camera

I am not sure how your observations fit into this scheme.  When you  
increase the delay for the shutter, Micro-Manager will first open the  
shutter and then wait for the delay time before calling SnapImage. The  
net effect is that the shutter will be open longer, but the timing  
between shutter and camera should be unaffected (i.e., the camera  
still starts exposing after a fixed delay after the LED goes on).

I am afraid that you would need to hook up an oscilloscope to the TTL  
coming from the LED, and preferably also to a TTL on the camera that  
indicates whether the camera is exposing (if your camera has one) to  
get to the cause of the problem.  You would also be helped by hooking  
up a very fast light probe and display at the same time on the  
oscilloscope.  Not an easy experiment...

Best,

Nico


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Serge Pelet
Hi Nico,
Thanks for the explanation.

> I think that the logic in your setup is as follows when you do a
> SnapImage:
> - Micro-Manager opens the CoolLED shutter
> - The CoolLED sends a TTL to your camera.
> - The camera (set in Edge Trigger mode) starts exposing a fixed period
> after receiving the TTL.  This is camera dependent, check your manual
> for the time delay.  For the C9100-13 I have here it is 0.78 msec.
> - The camera will expose for the exposure time that you have
> previously set.
> - In the mean time, Micro-Manager will call the camera function
> "SnapImage" (after waiting for the delay that you have given to the
> shutter).
> - The Hamamatsu Snapimage function in your case will simply wait for
> the duration of the exposure time.
> - The camera will start readout of the image once the exposure is  
> done.
> - Micro-Manager will close the shutter and wait for the image to be
> delivered by the camera

If I understand correctly, Micro-Manager does not recieve a signal  
from the CCD saying that the image acquisition is finished before  
closing the shutter. If this is the case, assuming I  set a 0 ms delay  
for the LED shutter, but the LED has a variable delay which can go up  
to 30 ms I could close the LED 30 ms before the acuisition of the  
image is finished by the CCD. This could generate the fluctuations I  
observe in the images.

I don't understand why the switching of the LED is so slow and  
variable. I think you mentionned that in one of your previous post  
that it is inherent to the way you talk to the LED. One solution I can  
see would be to use a TTL from the parallel port to activate the LED.  
Do you think the temporal resolution would be increased?

Best regards,
Serge
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Gordon Scott
Hi Serge,

I can answer those.

The LED delays via USB or TCP are due to a 10ms granularity in
processing within the pE. We are considering ways to improve that, but
it will likely never get very fast due to the way we have to handle the
comms. USB is probably slightly slower than TCP as unfortunately we have
to poll the USB chip and can't use an IRQ.

The TTL inputs work in the tens of microseconds region. The sync output
also goes high during every On and responds within a few microseconds,
so could be used for slaving.

Kind regards,
                  Gordon.
--
Gordon Scott  Design Engineering
            Custom Interconnect Ltd.   http://www.cil-uk.co.uk
            CoolLED                    http://www.coolled.com
            Phone +44-1264-321321
            CIL House, Charlton Road, Andover SP10 3JL, UK

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Pelet [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: 15 September 2009 15:16
> To: Micro-Manager General
> Subject: Re: [micro-manager-general] Fwd: CoolLed and
> Hamamatsu Orca camera
>
> Hi Nico,
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> > I think that the logic in your setup is as follows when you do a
> > SnapImage:
> > - Micro-Manager opens the CoolLED shutter
> > - The CoolLED sends a TTL to your camera.
> > - The camera (set in Edge Trigger mode) starts exposing a
> fixed period
> > after receiving the TTL.  This is camera dependent, check
> your manual
> > for the time delay.  For the C9100-13 I have here it is 0.78 msec.
> > - The camera will expose for the exposure time that you have
> > previously set.
> > - In the mean time, Micro-Manager will call the camera function
> > "SnapImage" (after waiting for the delay that you have given to the
> > shutter).
> > - The Hamamatsu Snapimage function in your case will simply wait for
> > the duration of the exposure time.
> > - The camera will start readout of the image once the exposure is  
> > done.
> > - Micro-Manager will close the shutter and wait for the image to be
> > delivered by the camera
>
> If I understand correctly, Micro-Manager does not recieve a signal  
> from the CCD saying that the image acquisition is finished before  
> closing the shutter. If this is the case, assuming I  set a 0
> ms delay  
> for the LED shutter, but the LED has a variable delay which
> can go up  
> to 30 ms I could close the LED 30 ms before the acuisition of the  
> image is finished by the CCD. This could generate the fluctuations I  
> observe in the images.
>
> I don't understand why the switching of the LED is so slow and  
> variable. I think you mentionned that in one of your previous post  
> that it is inherent to the way you talk to the LED. One
> solution I can  
> see would be to use a TTL from the parallel port to activate
> the LED.  
> Do you think the temporal resolution would be increased?
>
> Best regards,
> Serge
>  
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this year.
> Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to
> market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009.
> Register now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> micro-manager-general mailing list
> [hidden email]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
>
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned by MailController -
> www.MailController.altohiway.com
>


This message has been scanned by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com

This message and any attachments are strictly confidential and intended solely for the addressee. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, in whole or in part, is prohibited. E-mails are subject to possible alteration. Custom Interconnect Ltd and the sender decline any liability if this message and/or any attachments have been altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.

Custom Interconnect Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 2026753. Registered office: CIL House 48 Charlton road Andover, Hampshire United Kingdom SP103JL.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Serge Pelet
Hi Gordon,
Thanks for your answer. I made a few unsuccessfull preliminary tests with the TTL triggering of the CoolLED. So maybe you can answer a few quick questions. I'm planning to use the USB port to set the active channel and the intensity of the LED and the parallel port of the computer to generate the TTL signal. Is that actually possible or do I have to use only a single communication interface (USB vs. TTL)? Can I send only the TTL triggering signal between pin 9 and 2 or do I also need to define wich LED should be turned on with pins 10-13?
Best,
Serge



Serge Pelet
ETH-Zurich
Institute of Biochemistry
CH-8093 Zurich

Phone: +41 44 633 44 17
Fax: +41 44 632 12 98



On 15 sept. 09, at 16:27, Gordon Scott wrote:

Hi Serge,

I can answer those.

The LED delays via USB or TCP are due to a 10ms granularity in
processing within the pE. We are considering ways to improve that, but
it will likely never get very fast due to the way we have to handle the
comms. USB is probably slightly slower than TCP as unfortunately we have
to poll the USB chip and can't use an IRQ.

The TTL inputs work in the tens of microseconds region. The sync output
also goes high during every On and responds within a few microseconds,
so could be used for slaving.

Kind regards,
 Gordon.
--
Gordon Scott  Design Engineering
   Custom Interconnect Ltd.   http://www.cil-uk.co.uk
   CoolLED                    http://www.coolled.com
   Phone +44-1264-321321
   CIL House, Charlton Road, Andover SP10 3JL, UK



-----Original Message-----
From: Serge Pelet [[hidden email]]
Sent: 15 September 2009 15:16
To: Micro-Manager General
Subject: Re: [micro-manager-general] Fwd: CoolLed and
Hamamatsu Orca camera

Hi Nico,
Thanks for the explanation.

I think that the logic in your setup is as follows when you do a
SnapImage:
- Micro-Manager opens the CoolLED shutter
- The CoolLED sends a TTL to your camera.
- The camera (set in Edge Trigger mode) starts exposing a
fixed period
after receiving the TTL.  This is camera dependent, check
your manual
for the time delay.  For the C9100-13 I have here it is 0.78 msec.
- The camera will expose for the exposure time that you have
previously set.
- In the mean time, Micro-Manager will call the camera function
"SnapImage" (after waiting for the delay that you have given to the
shutter).
- The Hamamatsu Snapimage function in your case will simply wait for
the duration of the exposure time.
- The camera will start readout of the image once the exposure is  
done.
- Micro-Manager will close the shutter and wait for the image to be
delivered by the camera

If I understand correctly, Micro-Manager does not recieve a signal  
from the CCD saying that the image acquisition is finished before  
closing the shutter. If this is the case, assuming I  set a 0
ms delay  
for the LED shutter, but the LED has a variable delay which
can go up  
to 30 ms I could close the LED 30 ms before the acuisition of the  
image is finished by the CCD. This could generate the fluctuations I  
observe in the images.

I don't understand why the switching of the LED is so slow and  
variable. I think you mentionned that in one of your previous post  
that it is inherent to the way you talk to the LED. One
solution I can  
see would be to use a TTL from the parallel port to activate
the LED.  
Do you think the temporal resolution would be increased?

Best regards,
Serge


--------------------------------------------------------------
----------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year.
Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to
market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009.
Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general




This message has been scanned by MailController -
www.MailController.altohiway.com



This message has been scanned by MailController - www.MailController.altohiway.com

This message and any attachments are strictly confidential and intended solely for the addressee. Any unauthorized use or disclosure, in whole or in part, is prohibited. E-mails are subject to possible alteration. Custom Interconnect Ltd and the sender decline any liability if this message and/or any attachments have been altered, changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.

Custom Interconnect Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 2026753. Registered office: CIL House 48 Charlton road Andover, Hampshire United Kingdom SP103JL.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Fwd: CoolLed and Hamamatsu Orca camera

Gordon Scott
Hi Serge,

The TTL On/Off lines, USB and TCP should all coexist reasonable sanely.
TTL takes On/Off precedence, but level adjustments and so on should work
just fine.

The TTL Trigger input can be a little different.

The Pod controls are disabled because it's unrealistic for us to keep
them closely enough synchronised that the user can be sure they're
controlling the right thing. I'm still not wholly sure that's the right
strategy, but it seemed reasonably sensible when we did it.

There can sometimes be some confusion within the pE software as the
Trigger input and TTL On/Off inputs have to share a single IRQ pin on
the CPU. The behaviour of the pE is dependent on the software making the
right understanding of the five input lines. If you have funny
behaviour, please describe it and I'll try to work out what's going on.

Kind regards,
                  Gordon.
--
Gordon Scott  Design Engineering
            Custom Interconnect Ltd.   http://www.cil-uk.co.uk
            CoolLED                    http://www.coolled.com
            Phone +44-1264-321321
            CIL House, Charlton Road, Andover SP10 3JL, UK

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Serge Pelet [mailto:[hidden email]]
> Sent: 21 September 2009 10:21
> To: Micro-Manager General
> Subject: Re: [micro-manager-general] Fwd: CoolLed and
> Hamamatsu Orca camera
>
> Hi Gordon,
> Thanks for your answer. I made a few unsuccessfull
> preliminary tests with the TTL triggering of the CoolLED. So
> maybe you can answer a few quick questions. I'm planning to
> use the USB port to set the active channel and the intensity
> of the LED and the parallel port of the computer to generate
> the TTL signal. Is that actually possible or do I have to use
> only a single communication interface (USB vs. TTL)? Can I
> send only the TTL triggering signal between pin 9 and 2 or do
> I also need to define wich LED should be turned on with pins 10-13?
> Best,
> Serge
>
>
>
> Serge Pelet
> ETH-Zurich
> Institute of Biochemistry
> Schafmattstr. 18 HPM G7
> CH-8093 Zurich
>
> [hidden email]
> Phone: +41 44 633 44 17
> Fax: +41 44 632 12 98
>
>
>
> On 15 sept. 09, at 16:27, Gordon Scott wrote:
>
>
> Hi Serge,
>
> I can answer those.
>
> The LED delays via USB or TCP are due to a 10ms granularity in
> processing within the pE. We are considering ways to
> improve that, but
> it will likely never get very fast due to the way we
> have to handle the
> comms. USB is probably slightly slower than TCP as
> unfortunately we have
> to poll the USB chip and can't use an IRQ.
>
> The TTL inputs work in the tens of microseconds region.
> The sync output
> also goes high during every On and responds within a
> few microseconds,
> so could be used for slaving.
>
> Kind regards,
> Gordon.
> --
> Gordon Scott  Design Engineering
>   Custom Interconnect Ltd.   http://www.cil-uk.co.uk
>   CoolLED                    http://www.coolled.com
>   Phone +44-1264-321321
>   CIL House, Charlton Road, Andover SP10 3JL, UK
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
> From: Serge Pelet [mailto:[hidden email]]
>
>
> Sent: 15 September 2009 15:16
>
>
> To: Micro-Manager General
>
>
> Subject: Re: [micro-manager-general] Fwd: CoolLed and
>
>
> Hamamatsu Orca camera
>
>
>
> Hi Nico,
>
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
>
>
> I think that the logic in your setup is
> as follows when you do a
>
>
> SnapImage:
>
>
> - Micro-Manager opens the CoolLED shutter
>
>
> - The CoolLED sends a TTL to your camera.
>
>
> - The camera (set in Edge Trigger mode)
> starts exposing a
>
>
> fixed period
>
>
> after receiving the TTL.  This is
> camera dependent, check
>
>
> your manual
>
>
> for the time delay.  For the C9100-13 I
> have here it is 0.78 msec.
>
>
> - The camera will expose for the
> exposure time that you have
>
>
> previously set.
>
>
> - In the mean time, Micro-Manager will
> call the camera function
>
>
> "SnapImage" (after waiting for the
> delay that you have given to the
>
>
> shutter).
>
>
> - The Hamamatsu Snapimage function in
> your case will simply wait for
>
>
> the duration of the exposure time.
>
>
> - The camera will start readout of the
> image once the exposure is  
>
>
> done.
>
>
> - Micro-Manager will close the shutter
> and wait for the image to be
>
>
> delivered by the camera
>
>
>
> If I understand correctly, Micro-Manager does
> not recieve a signal  
>
>
> from the CCD saying that the image acquisition
> is finished before  
>
>
> closing the shutter. If this is the case,
> assuming I  set a 0
>
>
> ms delay  
>
>
> for the LED shutter, but the LED has a variable
> delay which
>
>
> can go up  
>
>
> to 30 ms I could close the LED 30 ms before the
> acuisition of the  
>
>
> image is finished by the CCD. This could
> generate the fluctuations I  
>
>
> observe in the images.
>
>
>
> I don't understand why the switching of the LED
> is so slow and  
>
>
> variable. I think you mentionned that in one of
> your previous post  
>
>
> that it is inherent to the way you talk to the LED. One
>
>
> solution I can  
>
>
> see would be to use a TTL from the parallel
> port to activate
>
>
> the LED.  
>
>
> Do you think the temporal resolution would be increased?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Serge
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ----------------
>
>
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg;
> Developer Conference in SF, CA
>
>
> is the only developer event you need to attend
> this year.
>
>
> Jumpstart your
>
>
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile
> applications to
>
>
> market and stay
>
>
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November
> 9&#45;12, 2009.
>
>
> Register now&#33;
>
>
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> micro-manager-general mailing list
>
>
> [hidden email]
>
>
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned by MailController -
>
>
> www.MailController.altohiway.com
>
>
>
>
>
> This message has been scanned by MailController -
> www.MailController.altohiway.com
>
> This message and any attachments are strictly
> confidential and intended solely for the addressee. Any
> unauthorized use or disclosure, in whole or in part, is
> prohibited. E-mails are subject to possible alteration.
> Custom Interconnect Ltd and the sender decline any liability
> if this message and/or any attachments have been altered,
> changed or falsified. If you are not the intended recipient
> of this message, please delete it and notify the sender immediately.
>
> Custom Interconnect Limited is a limited company
> registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 2026753.
> Registered office: CIL House 48 Charlton road Andover,
> Hampshire United Kingdom SP103JL.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------------
> Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer
> Conference in SF, CA
> is the only developer event you need to attend this
> year. Jumpstart your
> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications
> to market and stay
> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12,
> 2009. Register now&#33;
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
> _______________________________________________
> micro-manager-general mailing list
> [hidden email]
>
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
>
>
>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry&reg; Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9&#45;12, 2009. Register now&#33;
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf
_______________________________________________
micro-manager-general mailing list
[hidden email]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/micro-manager-general
Loading...